Comment

Comment by ABED MALHAS on August 31, 2010 at 8:11pm

ALLAH GOD DEAREST CREATION ON EARTH R HUMANS
CHILDREN are the assurance of OUR Continuity & defiantly include genius
CASA ( 117 Country / 2107 Member & growing )
is initiating
NOBEL PRIZE 4 CHILDREN

PLEASE

ALL WHAT IT TAKES

IS A SIMPLE EMAIL
in UR own words

WE need to persuade THE NOBEL PRIZE COMMITTEE
( info@nobel.se ; weboffice@nobel.se )
Copy 2 amalhas@batelco.jo


to include CHILDREN IN THE NOBEL PRIZE

" shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind " Nobel Will
WE believe including all the World Children ( more than 2 Billion Children )
in the greatest Human Brain acknowledgement ( Nobel Prize ) is the greatest benefit 2 mankind


Imagine one million child ( the more the stronger the impact ),from UR country or globally ,2 send emails in one day ( they will B at Guinness world records , & will positively affect World children , education, culture , humanity in general .
Please in any event U do try 2 have an internet corner 4 people 2 debate & send emails 2 Nobel committee supporting the idea of - NOBEL PRIZE 4 CHILDREN



www.casaart.org

Please join us ( free ) as a
Supporter ,Sponsor , Artist Donor
Please relay to all
(children , students , schools ,academics ,
artists , museum ,gallery , art outlets ,
sponsors , decision maker ,celebrity , media
education outlet & industry , etc.)

http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=create_page_6#!/group.php?gid=103854223006652&v=wall

http://www.facebook.com/pages/FAAVM-CASA-Nobel-Prize-for-Children-P...
http://www.gopetition.com/online/35957.html
Silla Campanini – architect - artist
CASA cofounder
Italy
00 39 051 04 47 484
campanini.silla@gmail.com

Roberta Stelvi
- a great lady , human , artist
CASA ambassador
Italy
0039 328.21.11.049
robertastelvi@virgilio.it

CASA Founder
ARCHITECT ( AUB ) - INVENTOR – PAINTER – PHOTOGRAPHER
Recipient of 10 International Award
Amman ,Jordan
00 96 2 65 81 59 55
www.casaart.org
amalhas@batelco.jo
ABED MALHAS

Comment by Jennifer -Human Rights Fighter on August 29, 2010 at 5:46pm

Urgent! Beware of Manulife Financial Scams for your future and for your family! Kindly support 80-year old couple victims’ justice!

Dear all Indian friends,
80-year old couple victims are cheated One Million Dollars and Threatened to Close Mouth by a lawsuit warning notice by Manulife Financial! Beware of Manulife Financial Scams for your future and for your family!
Support JUSTICE and clean financial evils in the world! To expose Manulife financial fraud for the world, in order to prevent such tragedy from happening to others , please click and spread www.financial-scams.net
Yours sincerely,
Jennifer Chim (Human Rights Fighter in United Nations )

Comment by ANIL GAIKWAD on August 26, 2010 at 6:31pm

JAI BHARAT
"TO BE BHARTIYA I LOVE BHARAT AND BHARTIYA CULTURAL MAKE FUTURE To promote the use of name BHARAT at the national & international levels

Please visit my website for WWW.SAYBHARATNOW.HPAGE.COM

Comment by Lou Gaskins on July 18, 2010 at 10:24pm

world debit card PinPay no credit check free
insured by the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to $250,000 USD.Register for your FREE card HERE!! http://bit.ly/aa8PCw SoftCard is an electronic prepaid debit account accessible worldwide




technology called PinPay debit card called SoftCard For the world's consumers, including the over 50 million un-banked in the U.S. with absolutely NO bank accounts, they'll enjoy NO Finance Charges, NO Fees To Obtain Card, No Minimum Loads, Convenient Cash Withdrawals, Easy Bill Paying, and Fast Card-to-Card Money Transfers Worldwide with “PinPay”! Almost anyone can own a SoftCard. Complete an online registration, receive your card number, username, and your account access password, and you are a SoftCard account holder. It is just that simple. There is NO setup fee, NO monthly fee, NO annual fee, NO age limit, NO credit restrictions and NO hassles. Register for your FREE card HERE!! http://bit.ly/aa8PCw SoftCard is an electronic prepaid debit account accessible worldwide, which uses the PinPay Network for all payment and money transfer services. PinPay operates independent of, and is not affiliated with, Visa, MasterCard, American Express, China Union Pay, JCB, Discover, or any other credit card associations. PinPay is regulated by the U.S. Treasury, and licensed as a money service business PinPayGlobal, Inc. is an approved Master International Sales Organization (MISO) of PinPay.net, dedicated to the world-wide marketing, selling, and promotion of a brand new breakthrough technology called PinPay and their brand new Pin Pay PIN debit card called “SoftCard.”For the world's consumers, including the over 50 million un-banked in the U.S. with absolutely NO bank accounts, they'll enjoy NO Finance Charges, NO Fees To Obtain Card, No Minimum Loads, Convenient Cash Withdrawals, Easy Bill Paying, and Fast Card-to-Card Money Transfers Worldwide with “PinPay”! The SoftCard is a very secure and efficient way to carry and transfer money. It gives you the ability to purchase products at participating stores and online malls and transfer money throughout the world via proprietary, secure and encrypted data transfer tunnels. It also allows you the ability to load money to your card, pay bills, transfer money to merchants, transfer money between cards, authorized debit cards, financial institutions, and withdraw cash at authorized banks, mobile phones, merchants and some ATM locations. Almost anyone can own a SoftCard. Complete an online registration, receive your card number, username, and your account access password, and you are a SoftCard account holder. It is just that simple. There is NO setup fee, NO monthly fee, NO annual fee, NO age limit, NO credit restrictions and NO hassles. Register for your FREE card HERE!!SoftCard is an electronic prepaid debit account accessible worldwide, which uses the PinPay Network for all payment and money transfer services. PinPay operates independent of, and is not affiliated with, Visa, MasterCard, American Express, China Union Pay, JCB, Discover, or any other credit card associations. PinPay is regulated by the U.S. Treasury, and licensed as a money service business CoNTACT :Pin Pay Global Inc. By : P.Abodes

Comment by sushil kumar singhal on June 21, 2010 at 8:33pm

at present i am the active member of kpcc and online join nsui,global media club of india, indian youth congress in every state but i have not got work and status go for work on india level to interduce young person in indian politics in all india level but require support of seniors wait for support.
sushil singhal
c/o ...singhal traders
No.252/A,7th cross,Ist main,
prakash nagar,
bangalore-560021
mobile no.09740536003
office no.080-32424879(fax also)See More

Comment by ABED MALHAS on April 30, 2010 at 1:38am

MISSION; LET US Enhance; World Peace - Tolerance – Cooperation; Understanding - Acceptance – Confidence; Recognition - Human Rights - Cultural Enrichment; – Positive Globalization; Love & Help the less fortunate; Protect the Environment; METHOD CASA is initiating six GLOBAL NEW concepts; - CASA; - ART OLYMPIC; - NOBEL PRIZE 4 CHILDREN; - CASA GLOBALTOURING EXH.; - CASA GLOBAL GENIUS VILLAGE; - CASA GLOBAL GOURMET VILLAGE; please join CASA & relay 2 all THE LEGACY OF THE CENTURY; www.casaart.org

Comment by Yogesh Saxena on April 24, 2010 at 11:52pm

Hindus attacked with grenades
Ignorant Hindus whiners,

At the time of independence the cunning British people gave the power in Bhaarat to their stooges. These pro-British, pro-English ant anti-Hindu leaders have created such a havoc by giving lots of facilities to Muslims and Christians at the cost of Hindus that that theses pro-British, anti- Hindu stooges are destroying Hindus and Bhaarat from with in Bhaarat. These anti Hindu rulers are looting Hindu money collected from Hindu tax payers and Hindu temples; Hindu Money is given to Muslims and Christians. No money is touched by anti Hindu governments of Bhaarat of mosques and Churches while anti- Hindu governments since independence has depleted Hindu temples by looting their money. Unfortunately almost 100 percent media is also anti –Hindu in Bhaarat as media is owned either by Christians or Muslims. Muslims get trillions of rupees in aid and benefits from Hindus in Bhaarat while they cannot even tolerate transfer a piece of nearly 40 hectares of forest land adjacent to the Amarnath temple for Hindu pilgrimages.
What did we get by being peaceful, non-violent, and Gandhian? Our parents and their parents followed Gandhism and Nehruism. What have they left us with? Today Muslims can come out on the streets and change the course of law, politics. What are we getting? Who is bothered about us? Intimidation, bullying, mini-Pakistan, no go areas for Hindus and police this is all that we are being faced with. If we would have done in 1947 what VHP - BJP are doing now this country would have been some what better, safer and terror free place to live in.
Kashmiri Hindus’ access to Amarnathji has been controlled by Muslims and like slaves we are expected to bow. If nothing, Bhaaratiya Hindus have not learnt the value of freedom. Bhaarat is still to get freedom from the stooges of British people and anti-Hindu people. We have to express ourselves and act in every manner possible to force the powers that be to take notice of Hindus as well.
History will say that the peace loving Hindus did not escalate the problem. Like the Pandavas, they only wanted the 5 villages so that they could peacefully exist but were denied even pilgrimage facilities in their own homeland by insensitive politicians and communalists. It is then that Hindus demanded their full fair share. The issue of denial of services to Amarnathji pilgrims must open our eyes to the reality of Kashmir today and shake we Hindus from lethargy. In the least, we should make our cause to be as espoused as the Tibetan cause. Article 370 must be abolished for the rights of Hindus in Kashmir.
Unluckily for Hindus minorities everywhere in Bhaarat are in command , anti Hindu people are in charge and will continue to be in ever more devastating scale under congress and Communist rule.
Many people have expressed their views on this topic. I will mail some of these comments. If you get any topic as repetition, then I appologise but still there are lots of people who still do not know what the issues are and problems which Hindus are facing. For the benefit of those people these various comments would be sent again with small adjustments.
Hindus attacked with grenades in Kashmir
Why do we feel offended if Hindus are attacked by grenades? This is a natural method for Muslims to reward Hindu goodness. Every good turn by Hindu deserves a grenade, because every good turn by Hindu destroys Musliness of the receiver.
Hindus harbored Muslims for 800 years or more. and how did they repay??? By creating Pakistan!! Bangladeshi were liberated by Indians. How did they repay...by illegal infiltrarion in India!!!
Now Kashmir is cocooned safely by article 370 and what is appreciation...DRIVE Amarnath shrine board and pilgrims to suffering levels!!!
To expect any good appreciation from Muslims is like expecting pigs to fly.
Only way to make them happy is to invite more grenades.
This fighting enemy of Hindus, the Muslims is an eye wash, whitewash, an illusion.
Our government at Delhi and leaders has assumed a MUSLIM MIND SET WHICH IS REINFORCED BY VOTE BANK. Your slogan jay hind is kept alive only as long as Muslims allow. As soon as they develop phobia, jay Hind will bite the dust.
See all the way down from 1947...where have Hindus won??? Nowhere!!! Every time they got the best and Hindus just waved Gita and Vedas with zilch gains!!!
This Amarnath fight is already lost by Hindus- by revocation of land allocation. So what are you fighting against...but a shadow???
Ramesh Jhalla
Yes, we Hindus don’t have any guns in our hands. We don’t have any armed force in our hands or on our side. But still we are fighting ……………………..
“ Akhanda Bharath Ki Jai “

It is high time Hindus should rise and stand up for themselves. Militancy needs to be met with militancy. All authorities bow in front of militancy and it is the need of the current times.

People should know that, the issue of helping Hajj pilgrims is still going on in the Supreme Court. But I think the government should not provide money for religious activities. Even if it provides, it should provide it for all the religions.

Hindus are all suffering due to the short term policies like reservation and subsidy for Hajj started by Congress. These are one way policies as no political party can remove them once they are active. Congress is doing the same mistake by encouraging Christian subsidy. It has started with 4 crores and would soon increase to hundreds of crores and extend to all other states. This is a short vision goal which is going to ruin the country. Soon all other states and religions will be asking for it and will make it tough on the financial exchequer. On one hand we don't have enough money for welfare policies and congress is encouraging religious based expenses. It has 3 serious disadvantages

By selectively giving it to certain religions it is driving a dangerous wedge among people of various communities and religions.
By starting a new trend, the plan allocation is only going to increase year by year and cut into the money allotted for welfare policies
Other states would start including this and if they don't then opposition parties and people will take it up as a political issue.

Hajj which was started for poor Muslims probably in Kerala state has extended to all states and has become into a multi crore spending by the state governments and central government. Any government should not start policies which are discriminatory in nature. What Andhra chief minister YSR and congress have been doing like Hajj subsidy and Christian pilgrimage subsidy are against Hindus. Either give it to all religions or don't give it to any. Why is congress hell bent on playing minority politics driving the country on religious basis? Some people say is YSR giving funding to temples...these people are kidding...it is the same money generated by the endowments departments from Hundis, temple lands. It doesn't belong to the government. But in case of churches and mosques, the money is not being generated by people; it is a freebie from the government which actually belongs to Hindus and Hindu temples.

But by starting 5% reservation for Muslims and Christian religious subsidy Chander Samuel Reddy has taken a couple of steps backwards. These are very dangerous steps he has taken, as the spending on Christian pilgrimages is only going to increase and reservation on Muslims is only going to stay. Andhra Chief Minister Chander Samuel Reddy is pursuing such dangerous policies which have very bad repercussions on all state governments and the social fabric of the country.

He was only chief minister in the country who had guts to put in security cameras all over the mosques in the old city. There were no communal riots, there was one and it was neutralized immediately by acting tough. There were no bomb blasts during Chander Bhanu‘s rule in old city as he acted tough on Islamic terrorists.

On other hand why did YSR transfer Sanjay Jaju, who was doing very good for Hyderabad as the municipal commissioner...just because he wanted to remove all religious/illegal structures which obstructed the road widening? Why have been there a lot of blasts in Hyderabad during his rule? Is YSR not soft on Islamists?

Who cares about Hindu Humiliation in Kashmir - Asianet
03/07/2008 00:05:19 HK
Thiruvananthapuram: For Asianet, Iraq is much closer than Kashmir, For Asianet Saddam Hussein has more news value than Amarnath Pilgrims
As per Asianet News Reporter Venu, Why should be there a Hartal in Kerala in Amarnath issue as it is much far away from Kerala?
When Asianet aired live coverage of the execution of Saddam Hussien along with a emotionally charged reporting to appease Muslims many Hindu viewers wondered why this much sympathy to a dictator like Saddam Hussein!
Even Communist party called for a Hartal against Saddam Hussein’s Execution! Asianet which fumes on this Hartal, never came with any report to highlight the worst form of Jihadi appeasement and Hindu discrimination unfolded in J&K over the days.
They never called a Communist leader to ask why their party supported the Jihadi antinational element.
They never called a Congress leader to ask why their Government succumbed to Jihadi pressure after giving hope to Hindus
They never called a Muslim leader asking their opinion on the treatment of Minority Muslims in a Muslim majority state
If Asianet want to convey that Hartal is against the development of a State’s economy – It’s well understood and such discussions should be encouraged for the betterment of our society.
But it becomes a bias when a Reporter dares to ask whether, is it worth to protest against Hindu humiliation?
It is high time Hindus should rise and stand up for themselves. Militancy needs to be met with militancy. All authorities bow in front of militancy and it is the need of the current times.

Comment by Yogesh Saxena on April 24, 2010 at 11:52pm

Hindus are orphan in India as well as in overseas countries Why is it so?
Hindus are humilited in their own country and Hindus are suffered in Fiji,Malaysia,Tinidad,Sri Lanka,African countries and many other countries and have no support fron Government of India Why?
Because secularism is the guiding principal since 1947 under Nehru-Gandhi' s Congress and its foreign-minority rule in India for most of 62 years and at present being ruled by Euro-Italian women called Sonia Maino Antonio Gandhi where the P.M. and his cabinet has more respect for this dynasty[ nasty] than the people and constitution of India. They take oath for the severeignty and integrity of India but since 15.08.1947 the have lost sovereignty and integrity of India.
India's condition will be worse than Zimbabwe under the present UPA and its allince of opportunists.

REVENGE OF THE "RASCAL".
NATO bombed SERBIA to liberate the MUSLIM enclave of Kosovo. Turkey invaded CYPRUS to liberate the Turks in the North. Britain went out to FALKLAND ISLANDS to make sure that the people of British origin living there were not harmed. But when it comes to "Broken" Bharat under Congress (ITALY & ISLAM), the NATIVES (Hindus) have NO voice, NO status, NO identity, NO future- both at home and ABROAD. Why is this so?

Tamils of INDIAN origin have been killed, crushed and destroyed without mercy in Sri Lanka while the subjugated Hindus in their land of origin, India, watched.

For one “BOFORS CHOR”, who hated the Hindus, a MILLION innocent Tamils had to perish. Is it not like 1947 when for Nehru’s chair as prime minister FIVE PROVINCES had to be surrendered and two million innocent Hindu/Sikh lives sacrificed on the altar of Mohammed?
21st. MAY 1991: HINDUS’ DAY OF DELIVERANCE
On that day in 1991 a brave Tamil lady, reincarnation of Sri Rama's SPIRIT dispatched “Rascal” Rajiv, the reincarnation of Ravana's GHOST, to Hell.

Hindus in Hindusthan have NOT seen freedom or sovereignty for the last 1000 years.

What was supposed to be Independence in 1947 after centuries of savage and brutal treatment by Turks, Moguls and the British, condemned as “Kafirs” by Arab, Persian and Afghan MASTERS, not to speak of the Europeans, including the Portuguese, the French and the Dutch, besides the British, turned out to be PARTITION in which one third of India became Pakistan and reverted back to dark and savage Sharia Law. How are we to liberate the co-called Pakistanis from the agonising suffocating "Cage" of Koran? How? Their restless agonised soul is "on fire" because it really belongs to HINDUSTHAN and their deep spiritual roots are SANATAN DHARMA (HINDU) like their ancestors, for millennia.

Our cherished Secularism in Lahore was caught and killed outright. With the death of Lahore also went the memory cells in Hindu brain. There is not a single day designated to remember the time when Lahore, Multan, Gujranwala and Rawalpindi were in India. The very idea of mentioning "Akhand Bharat" to the RASHTRAPATNI Pratibha Devisingh Patil is like seeing a man eater TIGER in her dream.

In order to PERPETUATE his dynastic rule Nehru had to subjugate & impoverish the natives, intimidate and brainwash them, cripple their aspirations, kill their initiatives and keep them ignorant just as the British had done before. He needed strong allies. So he did the ultimate treachery by retaining the separatist seditious MUSLIMS back in his bleeding Partitioned India despite Partition!

Nehru refused to discuss or explain the terms and conditions of that historic & humiliating surrender. Nehru was an autocrat. He was a dictator. Territorial loss of India and the unprecedented scale of massacre of Hindus in 1947 amounted to the destruction of Germany under Hitler in 1945. In area Germany lost to Russia, Poland and Lithuania*** the equivalent of ONE Indian province whereas India was forced to surrender FIVE PROVINCES unconditionally to the ENEMY.

Dispute over Kashmir was of Nehru's own making. It was his idea of keeping the nation insecure, thus looking up to him & his Dynasty as their Saviour. It diverted the attention from the blood bath in Lahore to "saving Srinagar".

It was also his way of enriching himself with the wealth of the poor by taking bribes and commissions on big defence orders of expensive weaponry including fighter planes, tanks, cruisers, submarines and guns. A cunning and devious barrister!

The nation remained so impoverished that decades later Indira’s election slogan was, “Gareebi Hataao” (Eradicate Poverty!). This, while her own Dynasty & Party were continuously looting and plundering their dumb subjects, reducing them to grinding poverty through corruption, red tape and criminal neglect.

The DEVIL'S TRINITY- Nehru, Indira and Rajiv, sapped the entrepreneurial spirit, inflicted "license, quota and control" system of bureaucracy on their subjects and turned a blind eye to corruption all round. All rivals and challengers to their authority were promptly eliminated. All INITIATIVES died their natural death due to lack of encouragement and support. Only those projects got approval that were wholly or partly owned by foreigners or by Party supporters. One could not even admit to being a Hindu in Hindusthan.

Indira imposed Emergency and threw thousands of her opponents in jails. She started the training camps for Tamils to prepare them to fight against the Sri Lankan Government. That was meant to be an excuse later to send the Indian Army to kill them there. In the same way she contrived a trap for the simple Sikhs to launch her Operation “Blue Star” later.

Assassination of Indira provided her son Rajiv and Congress Party stalwarts the best excuse to massacre thousands of Sikhs all over India. No such massacre took place after Bapu Gandhi and Rajiv were killed. Does one need brains to comprehend as to why only the Sikhs and the Tamils were targeted so ruthlessly but not the Kashmiri separatists who have brutally forced the Hindus out of Valley?

Rajiv brought his wife from Italy in keeping with Nehru's contempt of native females. The elderly “sons & daughters of soil” did not see their own wives and daughters degraded by such “adoration of the foreigner”.

At last Divine Hand struck Rajiv and he got his due on May 21 st. 1991 for meddling with the Tamils as his mother got her due at Halloween, 1984 for meddling with the Sikhs.

The impact of Rajiv’s assassination was profound. Dynasty's direct STRANGULATING HOLD on the Hindus snapped. Manmohan Singh took over as PM and however much of a poodle he might be of Sonia, he is not one of (Dirty) Dynasty. The Hindus should rejoice.

Manmohan Singh put India on road to individual and corporate freedoms. Hindu spirit of initiative and love of adventure met in him. A new breeze of liberalism started blowing across India. His submission before the “White Elephant” is only the reflection of the Hindus’ very own deep attachment to slavery.

One must now watch out for another growing menace in the shape of the new dynastic "dog" who is eagerly waiting to sit on the Prime Minister's chair and then celebrate his “Royal” wedding at tax payers’ expense to Veronica from Venezuela. What sort of a set back that would be for the subservient HINDUS, only time will tell.

Here is a SLAP in the face of HINDU pride and patriotism. Quote: Rajiv Gandhi could not find more beautiful lady than Sonia Maino in India . Like that Rahul Gandhi is also unable to find Indian girl more beautiful than the Spanish Girl. Unquote.
(http://premendra.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/12/rahul-adamant-to-mar...)

Let us hope that the momentum toward freedom given by Manmohan Singh will propel the nation forward and there will be Divine intervention to take care of Rahul just as it did in the case of earlier Gandhis (the so-called “Mahatma”, Indira and Rajiv).

21st May was the day in 1991 when fresh breeze started blowing across Hindusthan, replacing the putrid stink of bogus Gandhis’.

Celebrate May 21st as India's Liberation Day. Let us invite our Tamil brothers and sisters from Sri Lanka to join us.

Let us now swear NEVER TO LET ANOTHER GANDHI SIT IN PRIME MINISTER'S CHAIR AGAIN. Hindusthan must at last be liberated by the Hindus.

Does it not sound right? Does it not sound logical? Does it not sound decent? Does it not sound commonsense? Does it not sound honourable?

But who will convey this message to the one billion out there- waiting to throw flowers on Veronica from Venezuela and touch her feet?

To Russia KALININGRAD, formerly KOENIGBERG.
To Poland EASTERN TERRITORY BEYOND RIVER ODER.
To Lithuanian KLAIPEDA, formerly MEMEL.
INDIA surrendered
SINDH, BALOCHISTAN, WEST PUNJAB (area 160,622 km². compare AUSTRIA area 84,000 km²), NWFP, NORTH KASHMIR, EAST BENGAL & DISTRICT OF SYLHET IN ASSAM

Comment by Yogesh Saxena on April 24, 2010 at 11:49pm

More than one hundred Muslims

More than one hundred Muslims have been charged under the much-criticized Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) for their alleged involvement in the Godhra massacre. No Hindus have been charged under POTA in connection with the post-Godhra violence against Muslims, which the state continues to dismiss as spontaneous and unorganized. The application of POTA exclusively against Muslims suggests that it is not behavior that determines whether an individual is labeled a "terrorist," but his or her religion: Islam is falsely equated with terrorism. The government of Gujarat has also allocated considerably greater resources to the investigation of the attack in Godhra than to cases involving Muslim victims. Forensic evidence suggesting that the train was set on fire from the inside, and not by the Muslim mob outside, has not found its way into the investigation. Given the numerous problems associated with the case, many fear that innocent people will be punished while the guilty go free. As the prosecution shifts from one theory to the next, the relatives of many of the Hindus killed are denied redress and face economic destitution.
The Godhra Massacre127
As noted at the outset of this report, the ongoing violence in Gujarat was triggered by the torching of two train cars carrying Hindu activists on February 27, 2002. The attack followed an altercation between Hindu activists and Muslim vendors at the train station in Godhra that morning, around 8:00 a.m. A Muslim mob soon gathered and surrounded the train compartment which was then set on fire. There are significantly divergent accounts about the events leading to the dispute that resulted in the Godhra killings. It has been widely reported that a scuffle began between Muslim vendors and Hindu activists shortly after the train arrived at the station. The activists, who had been chanting Hindu nationalist slogans, were said to have refused to pay a vendor until he said "Jai Shri Ram" or "Praise Lord Ram."128 As the train then tried to pull out of the station, the emergency brake was pulled, a Muslim mob gathered outside the train, which was then set on fire.129 Fifty-eight passengers were killed, including fifteen children and twenty-five women.130
The Godhra railway station is situated in an overwhelmingly Muslim section of the city. For three weeks preceding the killings, trains carrying Vishwa Hindu Parishad activists had been stopping daily in Godhra.131 The activists were coming to and from Ayodhya, where the VHP sought to begin construction of a Hindu temple on the disputed site of the mosque destroyed by Hindu activists there. VHP leaders had set March 15, 2002 as a deadline to bring thousands of stone pillars to the site in order to begin construction of the temple.
Initially Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi claimed that the killings were an "organized terrorist attack."132 Federal government sources speculated that they were "pre-meditated," or the work of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).133 However, senior police officials in Gujarat later concluded that the killings were "not preplanned" but rather the result of "a sudden, provocative incident."134 In addition, a report from the Railway Protection Force (RPF) concluded that the killings resulted from a spontaneous altercation between VHP activists and merchants on the railway that escalated out of control, rather than a planned conspiracy.135
There was some forewarning of violence from within the police itself. Additional Director General of Police G. C. Raigar provided intelligence ahead of the Godhra incident that VHP volunteers were moving in and out of Gujarat and could instigate communal violence. He was removed from his post after presenting evidence to news media that law and order in the state could be compromised by VHP volunteers coming to and from Ayodhya. He had also questioned the government's ability to provide security to the Hindu activists or take other measures, despite repeated warnings.136
In July 2002, results of an official investigation by the Ahmedabad-based Forensic Science Laboratory stated that the fire could not have been set by the mob from the outside as had been alleged; the fire, it claimed, was set from inside the train.137 Close on the heels of the forensics report, activists in Gujarat released the results of a detailed survey of the families of those killed in Godhra. The survey revealed that most of those reported killed, and in whose name revenge was unleashed, were not kar sevaks (Hindu activists) but ticketless travelers or free riders-a norm on Indian trains.138 Following media inquiries that the reservation list for that day be made available to the public, the Gujarat government released the names of thirty-nine of the fifty-eight who died. The other nineteen have yet to be identified. It remains unclear how many of those killed were kar sevaks.139
The findings of these reports have yet to find their way into the Godhra investigations, which are fraught with procedural irregularities that directly violate both Indian and international law.140
The Prevention of Terrorism Act
In March 2002, the state government charged those arrested in relation to the attack on the Godhra train under the controversial and draconian Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO, now the Prevention of Terrorism Act, POTA), but filed ordinary criminal charges against those accused of attacks on Muslims. Bowing to criticism from political leaders and civil society across the country, the chief minister dropped the POTO charges but stated that the terms of POTO might be applied at a later date.141 Eleven months later, on February 19, 2003, POTA was invoked ex post facto142 against 123 people accused in the Godhra massacre. The state contended that new facts had emerged in the investigations that satisfied POTA requirements.143
On February 6, 2003, police arrested Maulana Hasan Umarji, a Muslim cleric whom officials say masterminded the attack. The prosecution's theory on Godhra has changed track numerous times. Umarji is the third such "mastermind" to be identified. The first theory involved a conspiracy linked to Pakistan's ISI, the second to the underworld and drug smugglers, and the third linked to Umarji. Officials claim that during his interrogation, he confessed to receiving financial assistance from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Dubai.144 The People's Union for Democratic Rights, an Indian human rights NGO, has charged that the arrest is politically motivated. Umarji had publicly campaigned against the BJP during the December 2002 elections, and was heavily involved in organizing relief assistance after the violence.145 He was arrested based on the alleged confession of one of the other arrestees,146 yet in the eleven months preceding Umarji's arrest, not one of the seventy-odd people arrested had identified Umarji as a participant.147 Following Umarji's arrest on February 6, Muslim-owned shops in the town of Godhra closed down in protest. Some Hindus in Godhra also closed their shops fearing violence.148
While many of those arrested for post-Godhra attacks on Muslims are out on bail, Additional Director General of Police A.K. Bhargav admitted that POTA had been invoked against the Godhra arrestees in part to forestall the possibility of their obtaining bail.149 On April 17, 2003 a special POTA court rejected the bail applications of fifty-six Godhra arrestees.150 By sharp contrast, as of the beginning of March 2003, all but three of the sixty-eight accused in the Naroda Patia case were out on bail. In keeping with Indian criminal procedure151 the police had attached the properties of fifty-one of the fugitives in the Godhra case, but had failed to do the same for fugitives in the Naroda Patia case.152 Critics in the state, including human rights lawyers, add that POTA-whose evidentiary requirements are lower than those of ordinary criminal legislation-is being invoked primarily against those against whom there is little evidence.153
Police continue to dismiss the post-Godhra violence as spontaneous and unorganized; a chilling echo of Chief Minister Modi's now famous justification for the anti-Muslim pogrom that "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction."154 When questioned about the government's decision not to apply POTA in the Naroda Patia and Gulbarg Society cases, the police responded that there was no evidence of a conspiracy in those cases.155 This despite the fact that evidence clearly exists, and has been collected in meticulous detail by human rights groups throughout the state in the form of thousands of affidavits and reports. The evidence is simply not being entered into the police record. Responding to charges made by Human Rights Watch that POTA had been selectively applied against Muslims, while ordinary criminal charges were filed against Hindus, a government official told the Associated Press that investigating agencies "had found no Hindus involved in anti-state activities that threatened that country's sovereignty."156
In addition to the Godhra massacre, other cases involving sangh parivar victims, such as the attack on VHP Gujarat state General Secretary Jaideep Patel (see footnote 46), and the assassination of former Gujarat home minister and VHP functionary Haren Pandya are being pursued much more aggressively than those involving Muslim victims.
On the morning on March 26, 2003, former Gujarat Home Minister Haren Pandya was assassinated. He was shot at close range with five bullets.157 Three eyewitnesses who testified before the Citizens' Tribunal testified that they saw Pandya on February 28, 2002 opposite the V.S. Hospital in Ahmedabad setting fire to a store called Apna Bazaar Medical and shouting, "Let us burn these Muslims." Pandya, who was leading the mob in the area, also reportedly had prevented the fire brigade from putting out the fire. An FIR had been lodged against him.158 In August 2002 Pandya resigned from the ministry in Gujarat. A source close to Chief Minister Modi told rediff.com, an online news service, that Pandya was asked to either resign or apologize for appearing before the Citizens' Tribunal and implicating Modi in the violence in the state. He was believed to have told the tribunal that Modi met with top police officials on February 27 and gave oral directives not to interfere with the Hindu retaliation (see Chapter III). Pandya had denied that he appeared before the tribunal.159
In the aftermath of Pandya's assassination Gujarati police reportedly arrested and detained young Muslim men without producing them in court within twenty-four hours of arrest as mandated by law.160 On April 19, 2003, the government of Gujarat booked ten more people under POTA for their alleged involvement in Pandya's assassination. They were also accused of the March 11, 2003 attack on VHP leader Jagdish Tiwari, and for the serial blasts in three Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service buses on May 29, 2002.161
In addition to its selective application of POTA, the government of Gujarat has allocated greater resources to the investigation of the attack in Godhra than to cases involving Muslim victims. Public prosecutors in the Godhra case, for example, are paid at the rate of Rs. 7,000 (U.S.$149) per hearing while those prosecuting the remainder of cases are paid Rs. 400 (U.S.$9) a day, irrespective of the number of cases they hear.162 According to an Ahmedabad-based lawyer, a bias is also apparent in the selection of public prosecutors and the rigor of investigations. He told Human Rights Watch:
The government pays Rs. 7,000 per hearing to special public prosecutors working on Godhra. In Ahmedabad the public prosecutors will get Rs. 400 a day. Victims and complainants will not have faith in public prosecutors appointed by the state. There is also no criteria in appointing public prosecutors, like looking for ones who have handled minority cases in the past for example.... The Godhra case is much further ahead and all accused are Muslims. The prosecutors' theory is that Godhra was planned. They told the same to the Commission of Inquiry, but they have not proven it so far.163
The special public prosecutor for the Godhra case reportedly has over twenty-five years of legal experience in criminal cases. In contrast, prosecutors appointed to hear the post-Godhra cases lack the necessary experience to handle cases of this magnitude.164 The Gujarat government has also set up a special POTA court, headed by district sessions judge Sonia Gokanim to try the Godhra case. The court will cease to function once the trial is over.165 Law Minister Ashok Bhatt, meanwhile, ruled out any special courts to try cases related to the post-Godhra violence against Muslims.166 As a result cases may drag on indefinitely.167
Uses of "Terrorism"
The application of POTA against Muslims accused in Godhra furthers existing discriminatory views that equate Islam with terrorism.168 Following the Godhra massacre, the state and central government moved quickly to qualify the attack as a "pre-meditated," "terrorist" attack against Hindus. The recent revival of the Ram temple campaign, and heightened fears of terrorism since September 11 were also exploited by local Hindu nationalist groups and the local press that printed reports of a "deadly conspiracy" against Hindus by Muslims in the state. On February 28, one local language paper headline read: "Avenge blood for blood." Muslim survivors of the attacks repeatedly told Human Rights Watch that they were told to "go back to Pakistan."169

A resident of Naroda Patia who lost nine family members in the violence told Human Rights Watch: "They keep going on about Muslim terrorists, but who are the terrorists? Those who torture Muslims so much should be punished a bit. In a family of nine, I am the only survivor. Whom should I live for now?"170 Fliers in circulation in Gujarat for years before the attacks cautioned Hindus to "beware of inhuman deeds of Muslims.... Muslims are destroying Hindu Community by slaughter houses, slaughtering cows and making Hindu girls elope. Crime, drugs, terrorism are Muslim's empire."171 Similar fliers depicting Muslims as terrorists and sexual deviants are now in circulation in Rajasthan where the BJP is contesting elections later this year (see Chapter XI).
The labeling of Muslims as terrorists has also seeped into civil society. Teesta Setalvad, prominent Indian journalist, activist, and editor of the journal Communalism Combat explained:
The absolute horrifying fact of the violence was the paralysis and complicity of civil society in Gujarat, barring the few very brave and noble exceptions. This huge mass consensus that the discourse of the right wing has got, is really mirrored to a large extent in Gujarat, particularly in Ahmedabad city. So there is discourse about terrorist being used as an alternative to Muslim, where Kashmir is invoked to decide what should happen to Gujarati Muslims, as a payback. After the genocide the chief minister of Gujarat says, "why should I run relief camps, are they baby-making factories?" So this whole demonization of the Muslim community with no basis and rationality, no basis in fact, can really be observed in civil society in Gujarat. Civil society let this carnage take place, let the genocide take place, and even justified it in the name of Godhra.172
Members of the VHP and Bajrang Dal have also targeted Hindus for helping refugees, most notably Hindu doctors. Concerted attempts to communalize the medical and legal community in Gujarat may have obstructed the delivery of much-needed medical and legal aid following the violence.173 Journalists too have come under attack for their unflinching reporting of the events in the country's English media. On June 11, 2002 Chief Minister Modi issued a blatant threat against such journalists stating that, "Those journalists who cover Gujarat... may meet the fate of Daniel Pearl... Cover communal riots at your own risk, look at Daniel Pearl."174 Human rights defenders and peace activists have also come under attack, harassment, or intimidation. Threats are made publicly and privately. In December 2002 VHP General Secretary Praveen Togadia declared, "All Hindutva opponents will get the death sentence and we will leave it to the people to carry this out."175
Godhra's victims
While the government continues to fumble the Godhra investigations, the relatives of the Hindus killed in the attack are battling poverty and expressing their frustrations with the rhetoric of the VHP. Eighty-year-old Girishchandra Rawal, whose son and wife were killed in the Godhra attack, told reporters:
The VHP has cheated us in the name of Lord Ram.... What do I gain from supporting the Ram temple movement in Ayodhya? Even if the temple is built there my future remains insecure... I have already lost my wife in the Godhra carnage and the son who was the sole breadwinner of my family to the ensuing violence. The state government announced an ex-gratia (compensation) of Rs. 200,000 [U.S.$4,255] for the kin and later it reduced it to Rs. 100,000 [U.S.$2,128]. My son has left behind his wife and daughter, how long can I feed them on this meagre amount?
Rawal claimed that he had not received the additional Rs. 50,000 (U.S.$1,064) promised by the VHP to the victims' next of kin.176 He described Hindutva as "nothing more than a political plank," adding that if you "take the dirty politicking out you have a society that believes in peaceful co-existence."177 Rukesh Shah, a nineteen-year-old VHP worker who was in the train when it caught fire told reporters, "I lost my grocery shop in the violence. Did the VHP do anything to compensate me? Now I have to work as a daily wage labourer to support my mother and sisters."178
127 Reproduced in part from Human Rights Watch, "We Have No Orders to Save You," Chapter III.
128 Celia Dugger, "After Deadly Firestorm, India Officials Ask Why," New York Times, March 6, 2002; Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "Provocation Preceded Indian Train Fire: Official Faults Hindu Actions, Muslim Reactions for Incident That Led to Carnage" Washington Post, March 6, 2002; "Train attack not pre-meditated," Times of India, March 8, 2002; Siddharth Darshan Kumar, "Muslim attackers set fire to train carrying Hindu nationalists, killing at least 57," Associated Press, February 28, 2002.
129 Dugger, "After Deadly Firestorm"; Chandrasekaran, "Provocation Preceded Indian Train Fire."
130 "Death toll in Indian train inferno rises to 58," Reuters, February 28, 2002.
131 Priyanka Kakodkar, "`Just like Hindustan-Pakistan,'" Outlook, March 18, 2002.
132 Ashok Sharma, "Indian violence spreads in wake of train fire that killed at least 58," Associated Press, February 28, 2002. Reacting to government assertions that the Godhra incident was an act of terrorism, a resident of Chartoda Kabristan relief camp told Human Rights Watch: "They keep talking about terrorism and Pakistan. But isn't what has happened to us worse than terrorism?" Human Rights Watch interview (name withheld), Ahmedabad, March 23, 2002.
133 "Needle of Suspicion Points Towards ISI in Godhra Incident," Press Trust of India, March 1, 2002; "Conspiracy Theories Abound Over India's Religious Riots," Dow Jones International News, March 6, 2002.
134 Chandrasekaran, "Provocation Helped Set India Train Fire," Washington Post; Kingshuk Nag, "Godhra Attack Not Planned," Times of India, March 28, 2002.
135 The Railway Protection Force is a central government police force for Indian railways. RPF officers were present during the Godhra massacre; S. Satayanarayanan, "Godhra Carnage Not Preplanned: RPF Report Dispels Conspiracy Theory," Tribune, April 9, 2002.
136 Sheela Bhatt, "Intelligence chief who had warned Gujarat government transferred," rediff.com, April 8, 2002 [online], http://www.rediff.com/news/2002/apr/08bhatt.htm (retrieved April 17, 2002).
137 "Doubts over Gujarat train attack," BBC News, July 3, 2002 [online] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2087709.stm (retrieved June 5, 2003); Human Rights Watch, World Report 2003: Events of 2002 (New York: Human Rights Watch, 2003), p. 237.
138 J Sri Raman, "Hum Hindustani: A year after Godhra," March 3, 2003 [online], http://www.gujaratplus.com/news/print.php?id=7891 (retrieved May 21, 2003).
139 Concerned Citizens Tribunal, Crime Against Humanity, vol. II, p. 97.
140 In May 2002, for example, serum was reportedly injected into five of the accused before they were questioned. Relatives of the accused have also been illegally detained. Many have spent months in jail without being produced in court. Setalvad, "Gujarat-One year later." Late at night on April 29, 2003, forty-six-year-old Fakruddin Yusuf died in judicial custody. He had been booked under POTA for the Godhra attack (see below). Yusuf had been suffering from low blood pressure and lung and heart ailments. Yusuf's lawyer, A.A. Hassan, has alleged that his client died as a result of police negligence, adding that he was not given proper medical treatment. "Godhra accused dies in custody," Times of India, May 2, 2003; "Main accused of Gujarat's train carnage dies in custody in India," Agence France-Presse, April 30, 2003; "Godhra accused had lung, heart problems," Times of India, May 3, 2003.
141 Human Rights Watch, "We Have No Orders to Save You," p. 5.
142 The law was retroactively applied to crimes that took place before POTA was passed.
143 "POTA invoked in Godhra carnage," Times of India, February 20, 2003. The long debated anti-terrorism legislation, the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), was pushed through parliament on March 26, 2002. Its close resemblance to the much misused and now lapsed Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) of 1985 (amended 1987) foreshadowed a return to the widespread and systematic curtailment of civil liberties. POTA created an overly broad definition of terrorism, while expanding the state's investigative and procedural powers. Moreover, under POTA, suspects can be detained for up to three months without charge, and up to three months more with the permission of a special judge. Since its passage, POTA has been implemented against political opponents in various parts of the country. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2003, p. 241.
144 Stavan Desai, "In Gujarat, only Godhra case is fit enough for POTA," Indian Express, April 3, 2003; "Suspects in Gujarat train attack funded from abroad: officials," Agence France-Presse, February 19, 2003.
145 "`Muslim community traumatised in Godhra'," The Hindu, April 29, 2003.
146 "Main Godhra conspirator arrested," Hindustan Times, February 7, 2003.
147 Setalvad, "Gujarat-One year later."
148 "Protests over Gujarat arrest," BBC News, February 6, 2003 [online], http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2734001.stm (retrieved June 5, 2003). The Alliance for Defence of Democracy, a collective of NGOs and activists, announced that it will secure the services of prominent Supreme Court lawyers to represent those arrested as a result of the "misuse of POTA." The lawyers will also fight for fair compensation for all the victims, and against what they term the "illegal arrests" of peace activists and eyewitnesses. "Top lawyers to defend Godhra case accused," Times of India, March 13, 2003.
149 Under POTA the accused cannot obtain bail unless the court records a finding that there is no prima facie case against them. "In Gujarat, only Godhra case is fit enough for POTA," Indian Express, April 3, 2003.
150 "POTA court rejects bail applications of 56 accused," Press Trust of India, April 17, 2003.
151 See India's Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, sections 82, 83.
152 "89 killed in massacre, police let the probe die," Indian Express, March 1, 2003.
153 "In Gujarat, only Godhra case is fit enough for POTA," Indian Express, April 3, 2003. See footnote 143 for more on POTA.
154 Scott Baldauf, "Indian government struggles to maintain order; Continuing riots test Hindu-led coalition's credibility," Christian Science Monitor, March 4, 2002.
155 "Same terror, different laws in Gujarat," Indian Express, February 22, 2003.
156 Ashok Sharma, "International rights groups demand federal probe into killing of Muslims in India's Gujarat state," Associated Press, March 8, 2003.
157 Vikram Vakil, "Former Gujarat home minister Haren Pandya shot dead," rediff.com, March 26, 2003.
158 Concerned Citizens Tribunal, Crime Against Humanity, vol. I, p. 44.
159 Sheela Bhatt, "Haren Pandya resigns from Gujarat ministry," rediff.com, August 6, 2002.
160 Rathin Das, "Pandya killing: Muslims get midnight knocks," Hindustan Times, April 21, 2003.
161 "Gujarat books 10 under POTA," Indian Express, April 19, 2003.
162 Amit Mukherjee, "Godhra prosecutor to be paid RS 7000 per hearing," Times of India, June 22, 2002.
163 Human Rights Watch interview with lawyer (name withheld), Ahmedabad, January 2, 2003.
164 Amit Mukherjee, "Godhra prosecutor to be paid RS 7000 per hearing," Times of India, June 22, 2002.
165 "Godhra-POTA," Press Trust of India, March 8, 2003.
166 Sourav Mukherjee and Amit Mukherjee, "Trial begins in just 1 of 961 riot cases," Times of India, February 24, 2003.
167 Cases dating back to 1985 or 1990 are still pending in Gujarat criminal courts. Concerned Citizens' Tribunal, Crime Against Humanity, vol. I, p. 209.
168 See Chapter XI for more on the theme of terrorism in the BJP election campaign in Gujarat.
169 Human Rights Watch, "We Have No Orders to Save You," pp. 4 -5.
170 Human Rights Watch interview with Khalid Noor Mohammed Sheikh, Ahmedabad, January 5, 2003.
171 Human Rights Watch, "We Have No Orders to Save You," p. 43.
172 Human Rights Watch interview with Teesta Setalvad, Mumbai, December 21, 2003.
173 Concerned Citizens Tribunal, Crime Against Humanity, vol. I, p. 210.
174 Concerned Citizens Tribunal, Crime Against Humanity, vol. II, p. 31; "Cover communal riots at your own risk, look at Daniel Pearl - Gujarat govt.," Indian Express, June 11, 2002. For more on attacks on the media in Gujarat see Human Rights Watch, "We Have No Orders to Save You," p. 34.
175 Neena Vyas, "Hindutva storm will not be - limited to Gujarat - Togadia," The Hindu, December 18, 2002.
176 Sukrat Desai, "Godhra victims' kin say VHP has cheated them," Indo-Asia News Service, February 26, 2003.
177 Sourav Mukherjee, Radha Sharma, "Ghost of Godhra still haunts them," Times News Network, February 27, 2002.
178 Ibid.

Comment by Yogesh Saxena on April 24, 2010 at 11:49pm

Intolerant Opportunist fanatics via judicial pseudo secularism/terrorism are the cause of defeat to idealistic Hindu
Combating terrorism, now being discredited by intolerant fanatics and opportunists politician, under whom ,the elite citizen, responsible for the executive functioning and the Investigating agencies responsible to protect the sovereign power of the State are knee down in anticipation of their posting for greasing their palm. This is the greatest problem of the world. It has become the threat to the Nations, who encouraged it during the process of the struggle of cold war, with fellow nation. The god of hated filled cult having its mandate to get the rid of the world of proclaimed “infidels” and “heretics”, are themselves struggling against their own weaknesses The kingdom of Arabia was formulated on the principles, that this world rejected all type of injustice, violence, breach of peace, bloodshed, murder and plunder. Jihad was defined after the battle of Bard. It is written in the “Kitbag al Tauhid”. The tomb of Prophet Muhammad was virtually destroyed in 1803 at Medina and People Stripped the Kaba at Makah. These people were declared Blasphemous. Virtually “Jihad”, which was earlier known as the struggle against oppression and rather a struggle against their own weakness, has started combating against their own people. There was the reformation. People disallowed ceremonies for marriage and death. They prohibited the worship of the saints, adorning of graves, tomb and monuments. They prohibited and provided the restriction upon holding religious processions, sharing art, music and dance and provided the proper place to women as their god only exposes fickleness of their minds. Most of the Muslim peers are flourishing, because of Hindus only, and will be shut if Hindus stop visiting them. The mosquitoes are flying in the air to drag the blood from the body of the defenseless Non violent citizen. Mosquitoes, even lesser in number, will suck the blood of Majority. They become the scorpions, if the number of carnivorous human being are proportionately increased to insufficient numbers. These people are viper snake converted to Cobra. The number of these poisonous reptiles Increased. Even, if they increased in quarter to the number of other community, they become pythons. Stop them from doing So in India, otherwise we will be buttered, as Hindus are Buttered in Bangladesh, Malaysia and Pakistan. The submissive nature of the Hindus is evident even today, even a single person of other faiths Hindus are credulous by nature. They simply believed what others said without suspecting the ulterior designs of the enemy. There were occasions when the idealist Hindu rulers sincerely honored a treaty or ceasefire in war but the crook enemy took undue advantage of their credulousness and captured them. If there were Jai Chands in medieval times, there are Laloos, Paswans, Mulayams, Arjuns in this era, who, for their momentary selfish motives, are selling the interests of the Hindus in the name of secularism without realizing the irreparable loss being caused by them to their community. Gandhi’s secularism always aimed at destruction of Hindus at the hands of Muslims. Paswan’s secularism advocates a Muslim Chief-Minister in Bihar. Arjun’s secularism believes in distorting our history. Numerous such pseudo secularists have always been active to destroy the Hindus. Making films on Hindu Gods & Goddesses causes irreparable harm to the faith. Human beings personifying Hindu Gods & Goddesses, pasteurization of vulgar scenes/songs in temples, showing Hindu Gods & Goddesses smoking in ad films only lowers their respect in the eyes of people. . Inviting censure of Sikhs by films like “Sava Lakh Se Ek Ladaoon”, and “Jo Bole So Nihal” are live examples of the concern of the Sikh community for their gurus, which regretfully is missing in the attitude of the Hindus. The beggars wearing masks of Hindu Gods and posing as Gods for begging in bazaars & streets definitely reduces obeisance for the Gods. The Muslim invaders exercised every atrocity on the native Hindus. They attacked us. They looted wealth, slaughtered innocent people, converted Hindus to Islam at the point of sword. They kidnapped our women and raped them with pride. They broke temples and erected mosques over them. They even decked idols of those temples in the stairs to humiliate Hindus. Famous historian late sri P.N. Oak claims that the so called Muslim monuments in India were originally the Hindu buildings. The Muslim invaders plundered them, captured them, broke them, sacrilege them and converted them into Muslim monuments. The Hindus, instead of considering them a stigma on the National honor take pride in calling them national monuments. Millions of rupees are spent on their maintenance. Some have been given the status of heritage buildings. A community of self honor would never accept such humiliation like this It is marriage within consanguinity. Though marriage within consanguinity is against Hindu marriage Act, but the custom overrides the statutory provisions. This weakens the uniformity of the custom at national level and makes us a subject of ridicule by others. I have seen Sikh leadership fighting collectively on different issues like Delhi riots, turban issue in France, kirpaan issue in Sweden, Santa-Banta (ridiculing cartoons) issue in Mumbai, turban-scanning issue in America. All the Sikh leaders irrespective of their political affiliation fought it collectively. Similarly, Prophet Mohammed’s picture (cartoon) in a Danish newspaper attracted protest from Muslims all over the world. Conversely, you can amply see Hindu leaders neutralising efforts of their own brothers without doing something for Hindu welfare and blaming of violating secularism. It is nothing but a cheap effort to earn momentary & transient acclaim from others. On the contrary, the leaders of other faiths are fighting collective, forgetting their political differences, definitely fetches them tangible results. Mulayam’s secularism impels him declare holiday in U.P. on last Friday of Ramjan. Mulayam, Pasvan throwing Iftaar parties to Muslims and wearing Muslim caps on their heads shamelessly is the burning example of pseudo secularism. . Conversion of Bangladesh from a secularist to an Islamic nation in 1979 did not perturb these secularists, nor did the planned elimination of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan caused qualms of conscience to them. Now the only Nepal Hindu Country is Extinguished. If the journalist has started hurling the shoe on the face of Union Home Minister. It is the beginning of retaliating of the outrage emotion of the people to thwart the govt. , which is continuing by sheer opportunism and will perish it existences, as the combating the Islamic violence will come to an end. At least Mr. Jagdish Titaler and mr. Shajjan have been eliminated from the Zone of the fight in this battle by their field set up by their own guardian, for whom these criminals participated in Genocide and Murder of Khalsa Akhali People.
All the members of the court are considered as wounded, where justice is found wounded with inequity, and judges do not extract the dart of inequity from justice or remove its blot and destroy inequity, in other words where the innocent are not respected and the criminal are not punished. A virtuous and just person should never enter a court and when he does so, he should speak the truth; he who holds his tongue on seeing injustice done, or speaks contrary to truth and justice, is the greatest sinner .Justice destroyed, destroys its destroyer; and justice preserved, preserves its preserver. Hence, never destroy justice , lest being destroyed, it should destroy thee. In this world justice or righteousness alone is man’s friend that goes with him after death. All other things or companions part on the destruction of the body and he is detached from all company. But the company of justice is never cut off. When injustice is done in the government court out of partiality, it is divided into four parts of which one is shared by the criminal or doer of injustice , the second by the witness, the third by the judges, and the fourth by the president king of an unjust court. Legal justice , with a humane mission, must update itself to legitimize progressive urges, discern the reality of social changes and design its delivery system, so as to obviate the dominance of the Proletariat by the accelerate people’s access to effective., limitative justice. The contemporary command of social justice, which is also the socio-economic demand of the common people, is that the prevalent forensic astigmatism shall be corrected by sloughing off archaic, arcane authoritarian procedures which often spawn the paradox of a wealth of abuses and a poverty of access vis-à-vis institutions of legal justice.
The bar and the bench are meant to provide mutual assistance for dispensing the justice. A prominent Bar is always considered to be of utmost requirement for imparting the duties assigned to the Judge, while deciding the case before him. The opportunist Lawyers always get their position in the matter of Elevations of the Supreme Court and High Court Judges. How , one may forget the Incident of the Supersession of the three Judges, When Justice A. N. Ray was elevated as Chief Justice of India by Smt. Indira Gandhi. She purposely restricted the free speech of Indian Hindus, who were subjected to atrocities by the fundamentalists Muslims and ultimately the Suppression of the Right of free expression, Prohibition against resurrections and Suppression of the Right of Life came into Picture. It was the period worst than the period of British Rule, When at least Hindus were given their due protection against atrocities committed by Muslims and by Hindus upon the weaker Section Of Society. How one can forget the humiliation suffered by Justice H.R. Khana for giving the minority Judgment in MISA preventive detention matter pertaining to ADM Jabalpur case .Judicial activism was based upon accountability of the Executive action in the State. This was increased during the period , when Judges Of High Integrity, and Potentials were being elevated to the Bench. It was just after taken over the process of selection of Judges by The collegiums of The Judiciary. The system of Give And Take In the process of the Elevation Started. It was during the period of adorning the crown by the Judge of the particular religion, that 20 judges of insignificant age were elevated with the Idea of promoting the Jihad in the arena of the Judiciary also. Judicial activism abrogated just after their elevation. It has been finally came to an end. It is well known that accountability is not wanted by the criminals and when the foundation of their religion are it self based upon sex and crime, how does this situation , which promoted the deception by falsehood, cheating, subjugation and abrogation of the means of innocent citizen for promoting Darul E Islam may not be liken by them. Why these individual will invite the risk to have their Transparency and accountability. There was the mission with political agenda to capture the entire world in dominance of a particular religion, while Hindu judges remain satisfied with their lust for greed, power, favoritism and Corruption. Thus the beginning of opportunism has gone to the extend that Kashmir Brahmins, who were uprooted from their motherland, but their representative, after emergence of Gandhi- Nehru Nexus, for being them elevated to supreme Court and High Court of Delhi, have now started declaring that Aurangzeb was the Secular and the painting of M. F. Hussein depicting the portraits of Ma Durga, Ma Swarswati, Ma Parvati, Mata Laxmi and Even Naked Bharat Mata. The chapter of Judicial activism, which was once started by the esteem respected Judges of Supreme Court was not only eroded, but the Judgment given BY Justice Kuldeep Singh in Smt. Sheila Dixit, Mr. Kamal Nath cases ( In reM.C. Mehta Motal – Bias River Water Diversion were Reviewed by these Justices. . Smt. Indira Gandhi had taken the license to denounce the authority of Comptroller and accountant General by getting the Expenditure disproportionate to its pre audit limit, which was not changed. Now the Government is ruled by alien power. Sonia Gandhi has taken the command in her hand to mis-utilization the investigating agency of Central Bureau Of Investigation to get her political empire remain intact, even if no confidence motion passed by majority of political party. Now the Nation is Govern without any Ethics, that is , if you Show me the man, I will make a Law to benefit him. The judicial Activism is Over. The people are ruled by alien power. They can not Combat Islamic Jihad. Law does not talk with Justness. There is no accountability. Judges are elevated, having no essential qualification, which is based upon rational classification. Opportunists are elevated. Supreme Court Stay the entire proceedings, even beyond the scope of the adjudication placed before Them. Justice Nirmal Yadav elevated, who are indulged in briary . Number of Judges remained involved in Provident Fund Scam, but who has been resigned till yet. This idea may promote us of secularist Time and again Commissions have been constituted to convict, by hook or crook, the accused of the 1984 Delhi riots. It is the matter of disgraceful event in the history of Judicial accountability, that Justice, U. C. Banerjee may declare that there was no incident of Godhra Burning of Ram Kar Sevak and there after , even after the acquittal of the innocent people in Post Godhra Violence, Which Provoked on Account Of the Arson Of Godhra Mass Burning , the further trial in 2002 Gujarat riots even after their acquittal by the courts of law. On the other hand, terrorists like Wassan Singh, Zaffarwal and Jagjit Singh Chauhan deserving severe punishment have gone scot-free for want of proof and it did not impel any secularist to deplore such acquittal and seek re-trial. Mushrooming madrasas in the country indulging in anti-Indian activities. This does not worry these secularists but they have the audacity to term the activities of RSS and VHP as anti-nationalists. For them, religion-based reservation for the Muslims in AMU is not an anti-national act, but the alleged discrimination in relief-distribution to the quake-hit in Bhuj surely perturbs these secularists. 5% reservation for Muslims in A.P. awaiting emulation by Bihar and many other State Governments is another burning example of their secularism. Pampering the Muslims at the cost of the Hindus is an unpardonable sin, which cannot be forgiven by any rational and nationalist Indian. It is nothing but a political gimmickry for appeasement of Muslims to garner their votes, which has rendered the Hindus orphans in their own land. The coming generations of ours are being recklessly thrown to a disadvantageous position. The virtual slavery is inevitable for us. The irony is that their secularism erupts only when the interests of the non-Hindus are involved. Thousands of Hindus being murdered in Mopla and Naokhali riots before partition, lakhs of Hindus being butchered and cores suffering displacement during partition in 1947 did not make a dint on any of these secularists. Thousands of Hindus being slain in Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir and lakhs are being rendered refugees in their own motherland. This did not shake the soul of the secularists. Conversion of Bangladesh from a secularist to an Islamic nation in 1979 did not perturb these secularist, nor did the planned elimination of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan caused qualms of conscience to them. The kar-sewaks burnt alive in Godhra. This doesn’t make any difference to these secularists, but its reaction in the form of Gujarat riots is termed as a “blot” on humanity and the heads are “lowered in shame”. Muslim invaders looted & demolished thousands of temples and erected mosques over them, but redeeming Ram Temple from underneath Babri mosque is the “blackest day” in their life Secularism (or pseudo-secularism?) has done immeasurable harm to Hinduism. The selfish Hindu leadership, both religious & political, is always eager to compromise the interest of Hindus for transient gains, in the name of secularism, without realizing the harm caused to the religion in the long run. Is this secularism not applicable to Muslims? Never does a Muslim ever talk of respect to the other faiths. Hindus are always eager to appease the other communities (Muslims, Sikhs, Christians etc.) by following their customs/rituals. We may justify it as secularism, but actually it reflects our wavering faith in our own Gods and Goddesses. On the contrary, rarely is a follower of other faiths seen in our temples or practicing our rituals. The Hindus are not ready to bear pain involved in fighting for their own rights and always look towards others to fight for them. This philosophy has made us cowards to such an extent that we did not retaliate, even the invaders, who attacked us in our homeland. Just a handful of Muslim invaders attacked us, captured us, slew us, converted many to Islam, outraged the modesty of our women, broke our temples and used every possible atrocity to destroy Hinduism, but the philosophy of non-violence made the Hindus surrender every where. The Hindus, who believe always in the existence of Gods and Goddesses as the symbolic representation of their faith in the form of worshiping of trees meant for their own protection of life as synonymous to god like peepal, banyan, banana, tulsi and jand, tamarind, kalamba etc, as all having medicinal values and their cultural triggers. Their zoolatry is in worship to the different form of animals, as their existence is required to maintain Eco- Environment- Ecological Balance for survival of Human Race. Lack of faith has seriously affected unity among the Hindus and has lead to disorganization and weakening of the Hinduism. On thousands of occasions, Hindus have miserably failed to protect the respect of their Gods and Goddesses and religious This makes us unorganized and leads to lack of consensus on trivial issues like dates of Hindu festivals. Our religious scholars seldom agree on single date for festivals leading to celebration of festivals on different dates. This dilutes the devotion & enthusiasm and also impels a sense of ridicule for our religion in the minds of others. This is solely because of non-availability of a centralized religious command. This gave the others an excuse to shy away from the duty to sacrifice for the country. Whenever there was any attack, it was the Kshatriyas, who were to face the brunt. Many a time, their short number or non-availability of fighter-Kshatriyas, lead us to their defeat in wars.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page